Contact Us
Diagram showing an orange warning icon above a vertical orange bar on the left, with the text 80ms real-time decision, and interconnected icons including alerts, a globe, mobile device, and book on the right.
The Challenge
The bank’s existing fraud detection stack relied on relational and rules-based systems that struggled to trace multi-hop fund movement across large, interconnected account networks in real time. These approaches also made it difficult to detect coordinated behavior among clusters of accounts working together to move illicit funds.

The bank needed to uncover hidden relationships between accounts, devices, IP addresses, and merchants while scaling feature engineering for machine learning models fast enough to keep pace with changing fraud patterns. Building these capabilities natively would require a significant, multi-quarter engineering investment, including schema design, graph algorithms, and ML feature pipelines.

Beyond the engineering investment, there was considerable uncertainty around performance and effectiveness. The bank needed a faster, lower-risk path to graph-based mule detection without spending multiple quarters developing and validating the underlying capabilities from the ground up.
The Solution
The bank adopted TigerGraph’s Mule Account Detection Solution Kit, providing a pre-built foundation for graph-based fraud detection. The solution included a purpose-built schema connecting customers, accounts, transactions, devices, IP addresses, merchants, and locations through relationships including ownership, transfers, shared devices, and shared IPs.

TigerGraph provided graph algorithms and derived machine learning features, including community detection to uncover coordinated account clusters, PageRank and centrality to identify distribution hubs, shortest-path analysis to trace laundering routes, IP and device sharing analysis, and multi-hop mule analysis. These features could feed directly into downstream ML models as pre-computed attributes.

A production-ready investigative query library supported the full investigative lifecycle, from initial detection through multi-hop transaction tracing, suspicious cluster identification, behavioral analysis, and counterparty risk. Two pre-built dashboards accelerated stakeholder adoption and validation by providing visibility into fraud outcomes, model performance, and key graph analyses.
A circular diagram with a central icon, connected by dotted orange lines to three icons: a person with 60M, a dollar sign with 50M, and a database with 30TB. A cloud icon is also included.
The Results
By adopting TigerGraph’s pre-built solution rather than developing graph-based mule detection from scratch, the bank accelerated time-to-value while reducing the engineering risk of a significant, multi-quarter development effort. Its team could focus resources on tuning and scaling the solution to its own data and risk posture.

The bank gained real-time, multi-hop investigative capabilities that were not feasible with its relational tools, including tracing fund movement, analyzing shared IP and device infrastructure, identifying coordinated account clusters, and generating graph-derived features for downstream machine learning models.

The structured quick start process allowed the bank to validate results at each implementation stage before progressing to production data, while pre-built dashboards helped fast-track stakeholder buy-in and validation through visibility into fraud outcomes, model performance, and graph analysis.